Park.edu Home > Faculty Resources Quick Tips > Essay
Developing Essay ItemsEssay items are utilized to measure a studentÂ's ability to understand a concept as an integrated whole, demonstrate higher order learning objectives, and express original, creative, thinking. Because essays require students to generate their response, they are considered recall or supply items. Depending on the nature of the learning objective being assessed, essays may either require extended or restricted responses. An extended-response essay generally targets synthesis or evaluation levels of understanding and allows for extensive freedom in the content and format of the response; a restricted-response item is more specific and provides narrow guidelines for responding to the item. In addition to this distinction, essay items are classified as subjective assessment as there may be a range of variability in correct responses. One of the benefits of essays are that they go beyond simple measurement of content knowledge and offer students the opportunity to demonstrate judgment, writing style, vocabulary, and insight. The comprehensive nature of essay items makes them ideal for assessing how students select, organize and evaluate ideas. The main drawback of essay items is the time and effort required for consistent scoring. With this restraint in mind, instructors should selectively utilize essays to measure learning goals that cannot be effectively assessed via objective items.
|
| Learning Objective | Relevant Verbs |
|
To understand the similarities and differences between related concepts |
compare, contrast, classify, describe, distinguish, explain, outline, summarize, differentiate, group |
|
To interpret data or draw conclusions from a range of information |
interpret, estimate, draw, convert, illustrate, restate, summarize, translate, calculate |
|
Make assumptions or inferences based on relevant information |
infer, derive, draw, extend, estimate, extrapolate, predict, propose, relate, hypothesize, theorize, deduce |
|
To apply knowledge to a novel situation or task |
apply, arrange, compute, demonstrate, describe, illustrate, rearrange, relate, summarize |
|
To generate a novel idea or response based on relevant information |
create, compose, design, devise, draw, formulate, make up, generate, present, propose, develop |
|
To analyze a situation based on pre-established criteria |
analyze, break down, describe, diagram, differentiate, divide, list, outline, separate, structure, critique |
|
To evaluate the relevance or value of information |
evaluate, appraise, critique, defend, explain, describe, judge, criticize |
|
To integrate a body of information |
integrate, synthesize, arrange, combine, construct, design, rearrange, regroup, relate, write, formulate |
|
To extend information to formulate broad generalizations or assumption |
generalize, construct, develop, explain, formulate, make, propose, state, theorize |
Guidelines for Grading Essay Items:
When writing each essay item, simultaneously develop a scoring guide or rubric. The creation of a scoring rubric at this time will ensure that each question clearly targets the designated learning objective and can be clearly answered. A good rubric should include a checklist point system specifying the relative weight of essential content and technical considerations. Be sure the assessment directions include the criteria for evaluating each essay.
To maintain a consistent scoring system and ensure same criteria are applied to all assessments, score one essay across all tests prior to scoring the next essay. In addition to creating a more reliable scoring system, this strategy increases the efficiency of grading as the instructor has only one set of criteria to keep in mind.
Before scoring essays, review the material students were expected to learn and skim through a few essays to get a sense of what a typical response might be. This will promote a realistic match between student knowledge, grading expectations, and learning objectives.
To reduce the influence of the halo effect, bias, and other subconscious factors, all essay questions should be graded blind to the identity of the student. Folding over the corner of the front page or implementing a coding system can effectively conceal studentsÂ' names. In addition, if there is concern over recognition of handwriting, older students can use a computer lab to type responses.
Due to the subjective nature of grading essays, the score on one essay may be influenced by the quality of previous essays. To prevent this type of bias, reshuffle the order of assessments after reading through each item.
Essay items that require students to defend a position, draw a judgment, or formulate an opinion should be evaluated based on the strength and relevance of arguments, not on whether or not they agree with the instructorÂ's position.
Review Checklist:
| _____ | Is an essay item an appropriate assessment of the learning objective? |
| _____ | Does the content of the essay item measure knowledge appropriate to the desired learning goal? |
| _____ | Do instructions clearly specify the desired format and structure of the answer? |
| _____ | Does the essay question provide a clear description of the requested information? |
| _____ | Are grading criteria clear and available to students? |
| _____ | Is there enough time for students to complete all essay items? |
Resource Links:
- Teaching Tips: Test Item Writing (University of Alabama at Birmingham)
- Creating Effective Classroom Tests
- Writing Test Items (Michigan State University)
References:
- Aiken, L. R. (2000). Psychological Testing and Assessment (10thEdition). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Chatterji, M. (2003). Designing and Using Tools for Educational Assessment. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of Student Achievement (7thEdition). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Meaningful Assessment: A Manageable and Cooperative Process. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- McKeachie, W. J. (1999). Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers (10thEdition). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
- Popham, W. J. (2000). Modern Educational Measurement: Practical Guidelines for Educational Leaders (3rdEdition). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Trice, A. D. (2000). A Handbook of Classroom Assessment. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Summative Menu Links
-------------------
Questions concerning the Park University Faculty Development: Quick Tips website should be directed to cetl@park.edu.
Reference citation:
Mandernach, B. J. (2003). insert appropriate page title. Retrieved insert date, from Park University Faculty Development Quick Tips.
---------------------------------

